Interpretive Paradigm in Psychology

  • Nelly Marhayati IAIN Bengkulu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46781/nathiqiyyah.v3i2.171
Keywords: case studies, ethnography, grounded theory, interpretive paradigm, phenomenology

Abstract

 

The Purpose of this article is to know interpretive paradigm in Psychology. When researchers examine cultural behavior, especially the experience of individuals then to detect and describe some aspects of the implied culture, hidden rules, the meaning of rituals and worship in a cultural society, they should use interpretive paradigm. The interpretive paradigm in the field of psychology is a foundation for qualitative research methods. A qualitative approach can be used when the researcher understands the informants’ point of view more deeply, dynamically and will explore various factors simultaneously and can be used in informal situations. There are four types of qualitative research paradigms namely ethnography, case studies, phenomenology and grounded theory.

References

Asla, A. (2010). Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Serta Kombinasinya dalam Penelitian Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. (hal. 29).

Baxter. P., dan Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodelogy: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. Vol. 13 Number 4.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Pub: London

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.

Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (eds). Hanbook of Qualitative Research: Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi

Elliott, G. M., Audsley, R. W., Runck, L., Pechek, A. A., de Raet, A., Valdez, A., & Wilde, B. J. (2018). The Development of Self-Efficacy to Work with Suicidal Clients. The Qualitative Report. 23(12). 3004-3018. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss12/9

Hanurawan, F. (2012). Filsafat Ilmu Psikologi. Fak Psikologi UN Malang: Malang.

Hanurawan, F. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Ilmu Psikologi. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.

Johnson, R. B. & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research, Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. 5th Edition. Sage Pub: USA

Khun, T. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Peran Paradigma dalam Revolusi Sains. Terj: Tjun Suryaman. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung.

Marhayati, N & Suryanto. (2017). The Acculturation Strategy of the Tabut Community in Bengkulu. Studia Islamika, 24(3). 403-433. DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v24i3.4319

Maulana, H., Obst, P., & Khawaja, N. Indonesian Perspective of Wellbeing: A Qualitative Study. The Qualitative Report. 23(12), 3136-3152. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss12/1.

McCaslin, M. L & Scott. K. W. (2003). The Five-Question Method For Framing A Qualitative Research Study. The Qualitative Report, 8(3), 447-461

Mehra, B. (2003). Lives in transition: Stories of three foreign elementary students from India. The Qualitative Report. 8(3), 377-407. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR8-3/mehra.pdf.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park: Sage

Shiraev. E. B., & Levy. D. A. (2012). Psikologi Lintas Kultural Pemikiran Kritis dan Terapan Modern. Kencana: Jakarta.

Smith, A. J. & Osborn, M. (2014). Analisis Fenomenologis Interpretatif. In Psikologi Kualitatif Panduan Praktis Metode Riset. Terj: Budi Santoso. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.

Smith, A., J. (2014). Psikologi Kualitatif Panduan Praktis Metode Riset. Terj: Budi Santoso. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.

Starks, H and Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory. Qualitative Healt Research. Vol. 17. Number 10. 10.1177/1049732307307031.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Suryabrata, S. (2000). Pendekatan Kuantitaif dan Kualitatif: Makalah Pidato Pelepasan Guru Besar Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada. (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta.

Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meaning (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons

Wake, R. M. (2018). Unspoken Barriers: An Autoethnographic Study of Frustration, Resistance and Resilience. The Qualitative Report, 23(12), 2899-2919. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss12/1.

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research Design and Methods. Washington: Cosmos corporation

Published
2020-12-23
How to Cite
Marhayati, N. (2020). Interpretive Paradigm in Psychology. Nathiqiyyah, 3(2), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.46781/nathiqiyyah.v3i2.171
Issue
Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Nathiqiyyah - Jurnal Psikologi Islam
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Nelly Marhayati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).